| Hi all,
Farid -- thank you for answering Gaurav's question! Normally your directions would be exactly right, but in this case they won't quite work since we didn't actually make the Fusion package part of this release.
Gaurav -- I believe the Fusion group is planning to incorporate their Package in future SCIRun releases.
Cheers, Dave
-------------------------------------------
David Weinstein Technical Manager NIH NCRR Cenber for Integrative Biomedical Computing (CIBC) Scientific Computing and Imaging (SCI) Institute, University of Utah
On Jan 15, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Farid Harhad wrote: Hey Gaurav,
My name is Farid. I'm a scirun user from Louisiana State University. If I'm not mistaken, all you have to do is untar the fusion package in the src/Packages folder (where all extra packages are stored). Then run the cmake again with the new extra package. Namely fusion.
You have to adjust the cmake variable LOAD_PACKAGE from:
SCIRun,BioPSE,Teem,MatlabInterface
To:
SCIRun,BioPSE,Teem,MatlabInterface,Fusion
Make sure you don't add a space, otherwise, cmake will complain saying that it did not find the Funsion folder.
Good luck,
--Farid
On 1/15/07, gaurav gunjan jha <crazytitan05@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all !!
i have installed SCIRUN.3.0.0.tar.gz but now i want to have fusion package capabilities also.
can u suggest me whether fusion package can be installed after i have installed SCIRUN.3.0.0.tar.gz or i have to install separately
the set comprising : - 1) scirun.1.24.tar.gz
2) Teem.pkg.1.24.tar.gz
3) fusion.pkg.1.24.2.tar.gz
4) datalo.pkg.1.24.2.tar.gz
thirdparty_install.1.24.tar.gz
and also how should i install fusion package if i can include fusion package in the SCIRUN.3.0.0.tar.gz
On 1/12/07, J. Davison de St. Germain < dav@cs.utah.edu> wrote:
Hi Greg,
> I'm trying to build SCIRUN_CORE, tags/3.0.0 version,
> on msvc8. Configuration details are "static build,
> dataflow off, seg3d on".
>
> Error details are below. If you look at the code in
> TetMC.h, it's clear that when HAVE_HASH_MAP is not defined
> (apparently it's not defined for me), two struct
> edgepairless's will be defined.
That is strange... I'm not sure exactly what is going on there, but I
think you can just delete the final "#else" with the duplicate
edgepairless struct definition. I don't know why we haven't seen this
error appear on our systems... Please try the above fix and let me
know what you find.
> 2nd question: Are there any archives of the mailing list?
> I wanted to check if this is a known problem.
There is not an easily available archive of this list. However,
please feel free to contact me directly if you have questions and I
would be happy to look into them for you.
Sincerely,
J. Davison de St. Germain
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
- J. Davison de St. Germain dav@sci.utah.edu (801) 581-4078 -
- Chief Software Engineer http://www.cs.utah.edu/~dav -
- SCI Institute, SE C-SAFE University of Utah -
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
===========================================================================
== The SCIRun Users mailing list: send email to majordomo@sci.utah.edu ==
== for more details. ==
== Please acknowledge use of SCIRun in your papers and reports: ==
== see http://software.sci.utah.edu/scirun-biopse_citation.bib ==
===========================================================================
|
