Text archives Help
- From: David Weinstein <dmw@sci.utah.edu>
- To: Chris Butson <butson@sci.utah.edu>
- Cc: scirun-users@sci.utah.edu
- Subject: Re: [SCIRUN-USERS] tensor interpolation
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:27:27 -0700
Hi Chris,
For what it's worth, Gordon Kindlmann and I did a very preliminary
analysis of this for our Vis `99 paper
(
http://www.sci.utah.edu/publications/gk99/vis99_hueballs-paper.pdf),
and it turns out that for "most datasets, most of the time" (i.e. for
non-pathological examples) interpolating tensors component-wise
produces very reasonable results. This is the approach that SCIRun
currently uses (e.g. in the DirectMapping module). Other solutions
often involve solving "the correspondence problem", which can be
unstable.
Cheers,
Dave
On Mar 29, 2005, at 1:07 PM, Chris Butson wrote:
Is there a way to perform tensor interpolation in scirun? I know that
scirun can interpolate the tensor index but that's not what I need.
Rather, I am looking for an algorithm to interpolate new tensor
values. I
imagine this could be based on some kind of eigenvector interpolation
but
there are probably other valid methods.
Chris
=======================================================================
====
== The SCIRun Users mailing list: send email to majordomo@sci.utah.edu
==
== for more details.
==
== Please acknowledge use of SCIRun in your papers and reports:
==
== see http://software.sci.utah.edu/scirun-biopse_citation.bib
==
=======================================================================
====
===========================================================================
== The SCIRun Users mailing list: send email to majordomo@sci.utah.edu ==
== for more details. ==
== Please acknowledge use of SCIRun in your papers and reports: ==
== see
http://software.sci.utah.edu/scirun-biopse_citation.bib ==
===========================================================================
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.