-
jess
macleod
Shireen Elhabian
tag
shapeworks-dev-support
Text archives Help
- From: Alan Morris <amorris@sci.utah.edu>
- To: shapeworks-dev-support@sci.utah.edu, Allen Sanderson <allen@sci.utah.edu>
- Subject: Re: [shapeworks-dev-support] DT two versions??
- Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 15:39:26 -0600
- Ironport-sdr: QviYTNIbdTPtOAf68U/xXkMyAvVzQVu67emz9Jb/QhEGkphTveM/9Ad97ZjRJulTolgOl/vwtv NeHrTFRce5njjGObWkAggpfPN+ICipXotYQ1UOpXlWtsGnUgQEZtKItZcUn7VNT+pYv8RC3oM0 WYeTRrgTdeqxkkcTmJg3V93uiWhI1XQEpyp/q2t+Noir5ZtPhNJdW+p3K2bL/UYvuygU7cvGEM 4AIxsAeCLMVdG90aUgqhX53WVyjvcOUWCQfmjTyAUQDU0FRhn+Y0y58PhqMT1K8itKvVZ0yOjB f2s=
Hi Allen,
At the moment, the groom tools in Studio are completely different from
any other groom tools in ShapeWorks. There may be some overlap
because they probably use the same ITK filters for most operations.
We are still in the process of consolidating tools. We only recently
consolidated the Optimizer as Studio had a slightly different version.
Alan
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:04 PM Allen Sanderson <allen@sci.utah.edu> wrote:
>
> Question I ran GenerateBinaryAndDTImagesFromMeshes and got this file:
>
> 1515969 Jun 2 13:23 example_surface_1_00.DT_sp0.1.nrrd
>
> Then in SWStudio in the groom stage I did the Fast Marching DT and got this
> file:
>
> 418998 Jun 8 14:41 example_surface_1_00.rasterized_sp0.1_DT.nrrd
>
> I was expecting them to be the same size given both were computing the
> distance transform.
>
> What would be the difference in the files??
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Allen
>
>
>
> Allen Sanderson
>
> SCI Institute
>
> University of Utah
>
>
>
>
- [shapeworks-dev-support] DT two versions??, Allen Sanderson, 06/08/2020
- Re: [shapeworks-dev-support] DT two versions??, Alan Morris, 06/08/2020
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.
