- From: Josh Cates <cates@sci.utah.edu>
- To: shapeworks-users@sci.utah.edu, Michael Harris <Michael.D.Harris@du.edu>
- Cc: Joshua E Cates <josh.cates@carma.utah.edu>, Adam Cyr <Adam.J.Cyr@du.edu>
- Subject: Re: [shapeworks-users] Shapeworks 1.2 Win troubleshoot
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:54:02 -0600
Hi Mike,
At first glance, I don't see anything wrong with the input files
you've sent. I'll see what I can do about getting someone to have a
quick look.
Josh
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Michael Harris <Michael.D.Harris@du.edu>
wrote:
>
Hey Josh,
>
>
>
>
As I mentioned a few weeks ago, we would like to try ShapeWorks for a SSM of
>
the foot. To start, we have been trying a set of four feet.
>
>
>
>
We have tried to run ShapeWorks in two ways:
>
>
1- Using the Windows v1.2.0 available on the SCI website
>
>
2- Using the protocol and Unix executables from the femur shape
>
modeling paper I did with Manasi
>
>
>
>
We are having trouble running the software in each case. On Windows, we
>
have tried running with and without the Groom steps. After ShapeWorksRun we
>
get points files but they form shapes that are just a mess and not anything
>
like the feet we input. If we try to look at the individual samples in
>
ShapeWorksView, the program either crashes or shows a mess of blocks that
>
appear meaningless.
>
>
>
>
In Unix, I keep getting a 'Segmentation fault' when trying to run the
>
particle initialization. I have run the shapes through all the
>
preprocessing steps that I used on the past, even the ones that are
>
redundant with some of the preprocessing I do before ShapeWorks (e.g.
>
aligning, trimming the bounding boxes, padding, filling holes, cutting out
>
data that I don't want to affect the shape analysis).
>
>
>
>
Attached is a folder with the 4 samples in nrrd format. As input to
>
ShapeWorks we have also tried mha and tiff, but get the same results.
>
>
>
>
Is it possible for you or one of your people to run this small sample set
>
through ShapeWorks to see if you can get it to work? If there are newer
>
executables that would be better than what are on the website, we would be
>
happy to try them ourselves.
>
>
>
>
Thanks,
>
>
Mike
>
>
______________________________
>
>
Michael D. Harris, PhD
>
>
Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics
>
>
University of Denver
>
>
michael.d.harris@du.edu
>
>
www.du.edu/biomechanics
>
>
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.