shapeworks-users

Text archives Help


[shapeworks-users] Efficient way for a new shape


Chronological Thread 
  • From: wenzheng tao <wztao@cs.utah.edu>
  • To: Shireen Elhabian <shireen@sci.utah.edu>, Shapeworks Users <shapeworks-users@sci.utah.edu>
  • Cc: Ladislav Kavan <ladislav.kavan@gmail.com>, Ross Whitaker <whitaker@cs.utah.edu>, riddhish bhalodia <riddhishb@gmail.com>
  • Subject: [shapeworks-users] Efficient way for a new shape
  • Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 09:51:33 -0600
  • Ironport-sdr: 0gGFX86U4xQvOH1WLKJVjFCZLVFR8eI5K5OGieZ+xxClx/FrQj8swMgEKxIcclLzW7tO5FvkfO hk+fXK5iUXTTKzuhty4zmTg/N7xqap5K5OnRxlLKYd8x+1Qunaz+N/e0pLABXdvj3rEkyt4hWQ ny9jtASVpYvQh8brGrWHrEITDAVwXfcojKPnXm8aB7brkd+FkD4fbl/ercVbKR2BaGkpLgJWvn EX4lMiJt7gr/l2aqjJ1UJwZOnzCR4gHMKdT9l716MOm4uNrgeCxSlbskXmLUVpjutPCTAGODri A54=
Dear Prof. Elhabian,

Hi! We are using shapeworks to optimize correspondences of a new shape and it takes 84GB RAM. Is there a way to run it with less RAM?

Currently, I am optimizing the new shape with correspondences of 70 old shapes by filling <fixed_domains> and <point_files> in the xml. It is loading the distance transforms of all the old shapes, which might be unnecessary. We want to lower the RAM because we are deploying it online.

Please let me know if you need other information.

Thanks a lot!
Wenzheng

  • [shapeworks-users] Efficient way for a new shape, wenzheng tao, 05/13/2020

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page